Defense Seeks Suspension of 9/11 Hearings Due to Fears of Govt Eavesdropping

This is a crosspost from the Huffington Post

Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s lawyer on Thursday morning asked the military commission judge presiding over the trial of the five accused masterminds of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks to halt all court proceedings until the court could determine who might be listening in on defense lawyers’ conversations.

“Until this question is resolved, it’s impossible to know if we’re fulfilling our ethical obligations” to maintain the confidentiality of attorney-client communications, David Nevin told Judge James Pohl this morning, handing him a file of papers that he said contained an “emergency motion to abate the proceedings” until “we get to the bottom of this.”

On Tuesday, Judge Pohl said that he didn’t understand the courtroom technology well enough to know who hears the real-time audio feed, or whether it might include what defense lawyers say to their clients, or to each other, if their courtroom microphones are on.

Today, although he didn’t explain the technology or indicate whether he understood it any more clearly, he announced: “This is the last time that an OCA [original classification authority] or any other third party will be able to unilaterally decide that the broadcast will be suspended.”

He did not say, however, that he would or could control who else might be listening in. As he clarified later: “There will be all sorts of transmissions to third parties. There will be no ability for any third party to interrupt any broadcast.”

The defense motion to suspend the proceedings won’t be heard until the week of Feb. 11, when hearings in the 9/11 case are expected to resume.


Published on January 31, 2013


Related Posts

Seeking asylum?

If you do not already have legal representation, cannot afford an attorney, and need help with a claim for asylum or other protection-based form of immigration status, we can help.